Home/Tennis
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

Chris Evert and controversies go hand in hand. Whether it’s her bold takes or her occasional bias towards certain WTA players, the legendary ESPN commentator does not shy away from speaking her mind. Considering her track record of commentary controversies, whether she’s actually calling the match or not, fans are always ready to call the WTA legend out. The latest episode was no different, except this time, Evert had her longtime friend and former rival Martina Navratilova stepping in to clap back at the critics.

Last week, Evert found herself in the midst of online turmoil. On August 12, she tweeted with excitement about the Emma Raducanu vs. Aryna Sabalenka match at Cincinnati, writing, “Boy! This @EmmaRaducanu @Sabalenka match!!!!👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏.” Her enthusiasm was obvious, but later on September 1, during the US Open, when Taylor Townsend was battling Barbora Krejcikova, some were left unhappy with the commentary.

A user wrote under the old tweet, accusing Evert of bias against Townsend, saying, “Chris, I loved watching you but the way you’re commenting about the CZE girl is just evil. We know your bias is with Townsend, but try to mask it would you.” The comment went viral, sparking controversy. Evert responded firmly: “I AM NOT COMMENTATING THAT MATCH!!!!!!!!” shutting down the accusations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Martina Navratilova then added her voice, writing, “This is why I don’t talk tennis much here—thanks to people like you.” She didn’t pick sides but made her feelings clear. It’s a pointed reminder of the pressures these commentators face.

AD

The truth? Chris Evert wasn’t even on the panel for that Raducanu-Sabalenka match. Adam Fielder and co-commentator Lindsay Davenport handled those calls. So, the fan blaming Evert was way off. But this mix-up came amid growing criticism of Evert’s commentary style. She’s faced backlash this season, particularly after stirring controversy with gender-based remarks about Karolina Muchova.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

This year hasn’t been kind to tennis commentators overall. Fans across the globe have not held back, slamming broadcasters for what they call unfair or “awful” commentary. While Evert escaped direct blame for this mix-up, the spotlight on commentators’ conduct has never shone brighter. Still, she did pick up criticism for her commentary during some WTA matches at the US Open.

Chris Evert and others under fire

On day five of the tournament, Iga Swiatek battled Suzan Lamens, dropping the second set but bouncing back to clinch a 6-1, 4-6, 6-4 victory. It was a win that brought relief, but the broadcast didn’t fare as well. WCBD Sports Director Mark Morgan fired a social media shot: “Hey @espn why is it during EVERY women’s singles match at the US Open the broadcasters are relentlessly negative? Seriously, Swiatek has won 6 majors, and she’s being picked apart. The men are not treated this way – show some respect. This gossipy approach is bullshit.” Harsh, but pointed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What’s your perspective on:

Is Chris Evert unfairly targeted, or does her commentary truly lack the neutrality fans expect?

Have an interesting take?

That day’s commentary team included main commentator Chris McKendry, co-commentator Chris Evert, and pundit Sloane Stephens. McKendry, a seasoned ESPN pro, brings energy and polish but has drawn criticism for light tennis insight and slipping up on names.

Well, Evert’s commentary remains under scrutiny, regardless of her actual involvement. Martina Navratilova shared her view, but fans’ opinions count too. What do you think? Share your thoughts! And stay tuned for all the US Open action on our Live Blog!

ADVERTISEMENT

Is Chris Evert unfairly targeted, or does her commentary truly lack the neutrality fans expect?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT