Controversy just can’t seem to stay away from the WNBA, and the Indiana Fever somehow keep finding themselves right in the middle of it. On August 8, DiJonai Carrington and Sophie Cunningham found themselves at the center of the action after a hard defensive play sent Cunningham crashing to the floor and Carrington to the locker room following a Flagrant 2 ejection.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

Two days later, Carrington has finally broken her silence, insisting there was nothing malicious about the play and that she was simply trying to make a hard-nosed defensive play.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m never gonna let a open layup just be had. You can pull clips from however many seasons of me making that same exact play. It was unfortunate that I made contact with her in the way that I did, but it was never intentional,” Carrington said before her team’s game against the Seattle Storm, according to Chicago State of Mind Sports on X.

During Saturday’s game between the Indiana Fever and Chicago Sky, Carrington tried to block Cunningham’s layup in the first quarter. While both players were airborne, Carrington swiped her arm to block the layup but instead hit Cunningham’s neck and face and wiped her out. Although the officials initially ruled it as a Flagrant 1, they upgraded to a Flagrant 2 and ejected Carrington.

Get the Essentially W Newsletter. Everyday front-court analysis and back-court drama — where the W takes center court.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Carrington’s night wasn’t over after the ejection. After being sent to the locker room for the Flagrant 2 foul, the Sky guard took to social media, posting “WHITE PRIVILEGE” and tagging the Indiana Fever.

That only added fuel to an already heated debate, with fans and analysts across the basketball world weighing in on Carrington’s ejection and the controversy surrounding it. Among them was former NFL star Emmanuel Acho, who pushed back against the suggestion that race had anything to do with the decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

“DiJonai Carrington posted ‘White Privilege’ from the locker room after being ejected for fouling Indiana Fever’s Sophie Cunningham,” Acho wrote on X. “Judge for yourself, but color didn’t have nothing to do with the flagrant 2. IMO.”

Acho would later elaborate on his stance on the Speakeasy podcast, arguing that Carrington’s claim had nothing to do with the actual play. “It was not a race-based decision,” Acho said, before adding that calling it a “white privilege-based foul” completely undermined the meaning of the term.

ADVERTISEMENT

He pointed to the nature of the contact itself, arguing that Carrington “hit her in the head,” and “didn’t connect with the ball at all whatsoever.” For Acho, those factors made the Flagrant 2 decision about the play itself, rather than anything to do with race. He ultimately described Carrington’s suggestion as “very ignorant” and, to some degree, “asinine.”

That prompted a response from Carrington on X. “I’ve never once claimed that the assessment of the foul was white privilege (that was your assumption). Try exercising your critical thinking skills, I know you studied psych. Furthermore, I’m the LAST thing from ignorant or asinine when it comes to speaking on “white privilege”; do ya research on that one.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Imago

Now, Carrington did offer some context behind the post. The Stanford and Baylor alum explained that her message was aimed at the league more broadly, with officiating being a particular point of frustration. She did not, however, clarify why she specifically tagged the Indiana Fever, according to The Athletic.

ADVERTISEMENT

Officiating has been a recurring source of frustration around the WNBA, with players voicing concerns about consistency and accountability for years. Those complaints eventually pushed the league to form a task force following the 2025 season, with the group tasked with identifying ways to improve officiating across the league.

Carrington’s response to Acho became another major talking point ahead of the Sky’s game against Seattle, with several analysts criticizing her take. However, despite the backlash, Carrington has found some unlikely support along the way.

Sky coach Tyler Marsh supported his guard and reiterated that Carrington did not intend to hurt Sophie Cunningham.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think the intent was to make an attempt at the ball, and that’s how she plays. That’s who she is. She’s passionate, hard-nosed, and it’s unfortunate that’s what happened. I don’t think that’s what her intent was…” Marsh said ahead of their clash with Seattle.

“There’s a lot of vitriol at DiJonai’s expense. There’s a lot that she has to deal with, as well. When we talk about protecting players, it should be every player.”

While a coach defending their player is nothing unheard of, DiJonai Carrington also found support from the rival camp. Indiana Fever coach Stephanie White came to Carrington’s defense right after her team beat Chicago 90-86.

ADVERTISEMENT

Stephanie White previously coached Carrington in 2023 and 2024 as the head of the Connecticut Sun. Connecticut was where Carrington broke out as the Most Improved Player and made the All-Defensive First Team in 2024.

“One of the things about Nai is that she’s gonna play her butt off, man. She’s gonna compete. Nobody’s gonna go walking in for a layup. And so I don’t oppose the hard foul. But I also don’t think that she intentionally went for the neck,” White said during the post-game presser.

Meanwhile, DiJonai Carrington is already looking ahead to another battle with the Fever. She posted “8/23” with a smiling emoji on X, pointing to the date when the rivals will run it back. But Carrington isn’t waiting until then to make her statement. She was already back to business against the Seattle Storm, and she certainly looked ready for the rematch.

Despite losing to the Storm, DiJonai put together an impressive performance, scoring 26 points while going a perfect 10-10 from the field. She also became the first player coming off the bench to record a stat line of 25+ points, 5+ rebounds, and 5+ steals in a game this season, according to Underdog WNBA.

So, whether fans accept Carrington’s explanation remains to be seen, but for now, her position is clear: the foul was unfortunate, but not intentional.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT