Back in March 2024, former Jacksonville Jaguars manager of financial planning and analysis, Amit Patel, was sentenced to six years and six months in prison for wire fraud and engaging in an illegal monetary transaction. Now, more than two years later, the legal battle connected to Patel is heading out of court.

Per Sportico, U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick cleared FanDuel’s motion to stay Patel’s lawsuit pending arbitration last week. That means the dispute will now be handled privately through arbitration, instead of the traditional court proceedings, with the process being led by an arbitrator. The judge reached that decision after determining that Patel had agreed to FanDuel’s terms of use, which were boldly highlighted in the document.

“IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO BINDING ARBITRATION AND A WAIVER OF CLASS ACTION RIGHTS” and “PLEASE READ THIS SECTION CAREFULLY – IT MAY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING YOUR RIGHT TO FILE A LAWSUIT IN COURT.”

Top Stories

NFL

Former Raiders Player’s Cause of Death Revealed Following Sudden Passing at 35

17 hrs ago

NFL

NFL Refuses to Back Down After Donald Trump Takes Aim at League’s Streaming Model

1 day ago

NFL

CeeDee Lamb Publicly Opposes Jerry Jones’ Longstanding Belief as Cowboys WR Makes Clear Request to NFL

1 day ago

NFL

NFL Accused of ‘Punishing’ the Broncos Over Sean Payton’s Troubled History With the League

1 day ago

NFL

Mark Davis Sells 25% Of the Raiders’ Minority Equity & It Has Massive Implications on Tom Brady

1 day ago

The message really was in all caps.

Where Do the Jaguars Still Lack Elite Talent?

Let Tony do the scouting, you just make the pick.

Pick your positions. Get Tony’s top 5:

QB

RB

FB

WR

TE

C

CB

DE

DT

G

ILB

OLB

P

PK

S

T

View Tony’s Picks

The development comes after Amit Patel sued FanDuel for allegedly worsening his gambling addiction by luring him with betting credits and gifts. As a result, he allegedly wagered more than $20 million from the team’s funds on the betting platform between 2019 and 2023.

While with the Jaguars, Patel managed the franchise’s virtual credit card program, being in charge of vendor payments and purchase orders. Prosecutors claimed that he abused that position by making fake transactions and covering them up with false accounting entries to mislead the finance department.

Authorities also said Patel’s scheme involved duplicating charges tied to airfare, catering, and hotel expenses while inflating legitimate transaction amounts to funnel more money out of the organization.

The stolen funds were later spent on a condo, vehicles such as a Tesla and a pickup truck, sports memorabilia, and other high-end items. At the same time, though, a significant portion of the money was also tied to gambling activity. That is where FanDuel entered the picture and exposed the amount of money embezzled.

According to reports, the lawsuit further claimed that he made roughly 1,077 separate deposits into his FanDuel account, with each transaction averaging around $25,000.

While Patel eventually pleaded guilty to the crimes, he later filed a $250 million lawsuit against FanDuel. In the lawsuit, Patel alleged that the betting platform recognized signs of his gambling addiction and suspicious betting activity. However, instead of stepping in or investigating further, they continued encouraging him to gamble.

According to Patel, FanDuel treated him as a VIP customer because of the amount of money he was wagering. He claimed the company provided him with nearly $1.1 million in betting credits, luxury trips, invitations to events like the Masters and the Super Bowl, along with constant contact from VIP representatives. In simpler terms, Patel’s lawsuit argued that FanDuel was doing more than just operating a sportsbook.

But now, Patel can no longer continue the legal battle in open court because of the terms of use he allegedly agreed to while using FanDuel. Even so, Patel’s legal team continued pushing back against the case being moved into arbitration.

Judge Broderick rejected Amit Patel’s “infinite arbitration” argument

For FanDuel, the lawsuit heading into arbitration is an important development in the ongoing legal drama. Because even if they eventually win the case, it would have damaged their reputation if the proceedings were public.

But Patel argued that FanDuel’s arbitration clause was overly broad. They described it as “infinite arbitration,” meaning the company was attempting to push virtually any dispute into private arbitration, even matters not directly tied to the agreement itself. Judge Vernon S. Broderick, however, rejected that argument.

He stated that Patel’s claims were directly connected to FanDuel’s terms of use because the lawsuit centered around how Patel used the platform as a consumer to gamble on the company’s website. The judge added that “there is no mismatch” between Patel’s rebuttal and the arbitration agreement.

This does not mean Patel has won or lost the case. He will still have to prove his claims through arbitration proceedings. Whether he can successfully do that remains unclear. The only difference here is that Patel’s legal battle against FanDuel will move forward privately under the confidentiality of arbitration rather than inside a public courtroom.