Home/NFL
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

The Commanders were planning a $3.7 billion dream stadium at the site of the old RFK Stadium in Washington, D.C. But Donald Trump might get in the way of their plans if the team doesn’t accept the one condition he has: “I may put a restriction on them that if they don’t change the name back to the original ‘Washington Redskins,’ and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, ‘Washington Commanders,’ I won’t make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington.” For now, it is unclear how Trump could put the deal on hold, considering former President Joe Biden approved shifting the control of the land to the District of Columbia in January.

But what Trump is demanding isn’t a simple name change. It would also mean that the Washington Commanders would have to erase the last four years of their history and get back to their old, controversial ‘Rediskins’ branding. So, the team finds itself trapped in a lose-lose scenario: Stand their ground and perhaps risk the stadium, or cave in and face a furious backlash. What’s most striking isn’t the demand itself. It’s the Commanders’ silence. Owner Josh Harris, too, hasn’t opened up on the matter.

The Cleveland Guardians, who faced the same ultimatum, quickly shut down any talk of reverting to Indians. Washington’s franchise hasn’t said a word yet. And NBC Sports’ Mike Florio wasn’t happy about it. In his latest article titled, ‘As Guardians dig in, Commanders remain mum on President Trump’s name-change demand’, he wrote:

“Regardless, it’s fair to expect the team and/or the league to have a response to the leader of the free world’s effort to rescind the team’s free will when it comes to what it will name itself. And it’s fair to wonder whether the reason for no response is as simple as this — the Commanders are being cowardly.”

Meanwhile, Trump claims there’s a hidden wave of Native American support for the old name, even though every major Indigenous group has called it a slur for decades.

article-image

via Imago

The names of these teams were changed as part of a larger cultural shift in the country. As corporate brands reviewed the use of racist caricatures and stereotyped names, they decided to make amends. However, Trump argued on Sunday that “times are different now.” But for a franchise that spent years trying to move past its old controversies, this is the worst kind of déjà vu. And just when it looked like Trump’s interference was the only curveball, the D.C. Council decided to throw its own flag on the play.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Stadium deal hits snag as D.C. council pumps the brakes

Just as the Commanders thought they were driving toward the end zone, D.C. Council members have called an audible. The team’s $3.7 billion stadium proposal was once slated for a July 15 vote. But now, it’s been pushed to overtime as lawmakers demand more time to scrutinize the complex deal. Funding for the stadium itself is still in the budget. However, crucial redevelopment plans around the facility have been temporarily sidelined. Council Chair Phil Mendelson insists the delay isn’t about killing the deal, but about perfecting it.

“We need to better understand the financials behind the housing and retail components,” he explained. The new timeline adds two weeks for study and public hearings in late July. Mayor Bowser isn’t hiding her frustration. Earlier this month, she pressed the DC Council on the stadium deal. “The only thing that will give me confidence is the approval of the deal,” she stated.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The Commanders, for their part, are playing it cool – issuing a measured statement expressing hope for expedited progress. But behind the scenes, the delays create fresh uncertainty for a franchise already grappling with Donald Trump’s name-change ultimatum. With political hurdles multiplying, the path back to D.C. just got more complicated. What do you think?

What’s your perspective on:

Should the Commanders cave to Trump's demands, or stand firm and risk losing their stadium deal?

Have an interesting take?

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Should the Commanders cave to Trump's demands, or stand firm and risk losing their stadium deal?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT