Home/NASCAR
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

Mark Martin had seen a lot over his decades in stock car racing, but even he couldn’t hide his unease after Saturday’s Xfinity Series clash at Indianapolis. The Pennzoil 250 was supposed to be a moment of celebration, as Connor Zilisch won JR Motorsports its 100th Xfinity Series race. But what instead dominated conversations was a late race incident ignited by a reckless Austin Hill, leading to pandemonium across the NASCAR circles.

For the unversed: With under 10 laps at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, Aric Almirola and Austin Hill were jostling in the top 5. While side-by-side, Almirola got slightly into Austin Hill’s bumper, leading to the #21 Richard Childress Racing car momentarily losing control. Hill swerved but caught his car back in position, and after this point, everything went south.

The Richard Childress Racing driver then proceeded to aggressively turn left and hit Aric Almirola’s right rear bumper, hooking him head-first into the inside wall. Hill also spun off the track as a result of that wreck, and everyone who witnessed it was stunned into silence. While the racer was given a 5-lap penalty, not everyone feels that the punishment fits the nature of the issue. During a candid roundtable discussion on the “Door Bumper Clear” podcast on Tuesday, Martin made it clear that what he saw was not just reckless racing, but a dangerous lapse in judgment. His comments weren’t speculative; they were rooted in experience and a deep understanding of the sport’s unwritten rules: “That wasn’t good,” Martin said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The veteran racer then explained that while emotional reactions are an inevitable part of competition, there’s a line good drivers simply shouldn’t cross. “He reacted with an emotion that he shouldn’t have. A great race car driver that he is, but a total package race car driver has to handle his emotions. That was an emotional move… he did it snap, without thinking. And you’ve got to be better than that.” To this, host Freddie Kraft asked, “I feel like now it happens three, four times a year. Is it just lack of respect for the other drivers? Is it lack of respect for the equipment that people are putting out there? What do you think attributes to it happening more now?

AD

Martin responded, “It’s the closeness of the cars, and I think that’s why the right rear hook happens so much…Right rear hooks are not good. Listen, a driver acting on emotion happens. Nobody’s perfect. I’ve even done it and all, but I didn’t right rear hook a guy,” before adding, I think that it’s good that NASCAR and the whole industry’s taking a stand because when you intentionally wreck somebody, we don’t realize that could k— that person. Honestly, stop and think about it—think about how your life would be affected if that person died. It would be horrible.”

Hosts Karsyn Elledge, crew chief Tommy Baldwin, and Kraft also underscored the seriousness of Hill’s actions, questioning its sportsmanship and calling for more decisive formal action. Tommy labeled the hit “complete bulls—-,” adding, “He should be suspended… this happens all the time with Austin. He loses his cool as soon as somebody messes with him a little bit.”

Martin and others didn’t just express disapproval; they highlighted a concern that unchecked emotions and retaliation culture might result in serious consequences. But now, let’s look at…

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Top Comment by Noname

Bob Scott

Too lenient. At the least, should be parked and given lessons on how to behave. Sounds...more

Share your take

What did the parties involved have to say?

The reaction to Austin Hill’s dangerous move and subsequent five-lap penalty has been swift and vocal within the NASCAR community, with many drivers, insiders, and fans weighing in on whether Hill’s punishment should be escalated to a suspension. Fellow driver Aric Almirola, the victim of Hill’s right-rear hook at Indianapolis, called the hit “definitely intentional”.

Criticizing Hill’s judgment, Almirola said, “He blocked me three times, and I finally got him loose into (Turn) 3. He had damage on the nose, so he was really slow in the corners. It was time to go. We’re coming down to ten laps to go, and the leaders are starting to put a gap on us. It’s time to go. I got him loose, and he just turned left and hooked me in the right rear. Honestly, one of the biggest hits in my entire NASCAR career. Very reminiscent of the hit I took when I broke my back.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

On the other side, Richard Childress, Hill’s team owner, publicly defended his driver. He dismissed calls for suspension by referencing similar past incidents he felt were inconsistently penalized: “Hell no. They didn’t do a damn thing to the 2 car [of Austin Cindric] when he wrecked Ty [Dillon] and admitted to it,” Childress said, via Dustin Long of NBC Sports. “Drove him in the right rear and wrecked him at COTA. It’s who you are. We’re a blue-collar team; they give us trouble all the time.

Hill also expressed frustration over the radio after the incident, claiming the wreck was unintentional due to losing control. However, his outburst did not quell demands for stricter discipline. Do you think Austin Hill should be parked next week? Let us know in the comments!

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Is NASCAR's penalty for Austin Hill too lenient given the potential danger of his actions?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT