Home/Golf
Home/Golf
feature-image

Imago

feature-image

Imago

Essentials Inside The Story

  • Jon Rahm questions the DP World Tour for using his commercial value and still punishing him
  • Rory McIlroy challenges Rahm to pay his fines to show his commitment to the Ryder Cup team
  • Rahm would pay the fines if the contract terms were more flexible

Back in 2023, world No. 2 Rory McIlroy pretty much asked the DP World Tour to rewrite its rules to keep Jon Rahm on the 2025 Ryder Cup team. Fast forward to now, and he is pushing the Spaniard to pay his dues if he wants another ride. However, the LIV Golfer isn’t letting the challenge slide by.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

“That statement would make a lot more sense if all 12 of us were being asked to pay, not only just the two of us,” he told the media on Tuesday during the LIV Golf Hong Kong event. “There’s more intricacy that goes into this whole situation.

“While I understand why he’s saying that, we all do it for the love of the game, it’s a different situation than what we usually see. I’ll gladly pay my way to go on the Ryder Cup, not have to pay to still be a member of the DP World Tour and fulfill a commitment that I’m fully willing to commit.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Rahm has been a two-tour member for a long time, which used to be the DP World Tour and the PGA Tour. Now, he is suspended from the American circuit as long as he is with the LIV Golf, but he still believes he shouldn’t be fined for simply playing a game he loves, no matter the tour. Meanwhile, the DP World Tour agrees to disagree.

The Spaniard was fined for playing LIV tournaments, which conflicted with DP World Tour events, without requesting permission from the European-based tour. In 2024, he still needed to play in three tournaments to be eligible for ryder Cop at Bethpage. He finally made those and booked his ticket to New York. As such, his hearing date for appeals against the fines was pushed further. Lo and behold, he stands on the same crossroads now.

McIlroy has only added to that fire as he challenged Rahm and Tyrell Hatton:

ADVERTISEMENT

“We went really hard on the Americans about being paid to play the Ryder Cup, and we also said that we would pay to play in Ryder Cups. There are two guys that can prove it.”

On the other hand, the 31-year-old Rahm’s point was straightforward: why are only two players from a 12-man squad being asked to prove their loyalty financially? His fines for playing LIV Golf events that clashed with DP World Tour tournaments reportedly exceed $3 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2x major winner and Hatton both appealed those sanctions in 2024, which kept them eligible for the Ryder Cup. That appeal allowed both to feature in Europe’s 2025 victory at Bethpage Black, where Rahm and McIlroy were key contributors.

The dynamic shifted significantly in February 2026 when eight LIV players, including Hatton, Adrian Meronk, and Thomas Detry, agreed to pay their fines, withdrew their appeals, and accepted a conditional release deal for the 2026 season.

That agreement allowed them to play LIV events conflicting with DP World Tour tournaments. Rahm was the only significant name who did not join that group, leaving his DP World Tour status and his place in Europe’s 2027 Ryder Cup squad at Adare Manor still unresolved.

ADVERTISEMENT

That decision drew public criticism beyond just McIlroy. Lee Westwood believes the Irishman is correct and called on the DP World Tour to schedule Rahm and Hatton’s appeal hearing for mid-February to reach a clean resolution.

It is worth noting that, back in 2023, when Jon Rahm first moved to LIV, McIlroy himself urged the DP World Tour to rewrite its Ryder Cup eligibility rules to keep Rahm in the picture. The fact that he is now on the opposite side of that argument has not gone unnoticed.

article-image

Imago

McIlroy’s 2026 challenge was rooted in the Bethpage context. He pointed out that Europe had heavily criticised the United States for paying its golfers to compete in the Ryder Cup, with European players positioning themselves as playing purely for the badge.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hatton, who settled his fines, largely stayed quiet on the matter and said everyone has their own opinions. But Rahm did not.

During the same press conference, Rahm was firm and direct in his responses to every question, especially when pressed on why he was not among the eight players who accepted the deal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Stories

‘Still Hurts’: Phil Mickelson in Mourning as Legendary Football Coach Lou Holtz Dies at Age 89

Rory McIlroy Gives Jon Rahm a Harsh Reality Check After He Accused DP World Tour of Extorting Pros

Scottie Scheffler Makes Feelings Clear on PGA Tour CEO for Making Controversial Decisions Despite Backlash

Jon Rahm Jumps to the Rescue of 7 LIV Golf Pros Stranded in Middle East Amid US-Iran Conflict, Per Report

‘They’re Extorting Players’: Jon Rahm Doesn’t Hold Back as 8 LIV Golfers Succumb to Pressure from DP World Tour

Jon Rahm reveals why he refused the DPWT deal

Jon Rahm’s refusal was not simply about the fines. His core objection was with the contract terms attached to the conditional release deal. The DP World Tour required him to play a minimum of six events, with two venues to be decided by the tour itself, which Rahm considered unreasonable and beyond what tour membership rules actually demand.

Throughout his professional career, the 11-time PGA Tour winner held dual membership on both the PGA Tour and DP World Tour and never once needed to submit a release request to play either. His argument is that LIV Golf now operates within the world rankings ecosystem, making him effectively a three-tour member, yet the scrutiny and penalties are applied selectively only to LIV players.

ADVERTISEMENT

He also revealed he put a direct compromise on the table.

He told the DP World Tour he would sign the agreement immediately if the mandatory events were reduced from six to four, which he says aligns with the actual membership rules. The tour rejected that offer, and Rahm walked away from the deal entirely.

What frustrated him most was the broader principle. He has consistently played the Spanish Open and committed to his four-event minimum every year of his career except one. His position is that he will continue honoring that commitment, but he will not accept contract conditions he views as the tour exploiting his commercial value while simultaneously punishing him for choices he made in a legally appealed dispute.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT